Afghanistan vs Nicaragua: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per

Afghanistan
3.82 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Nicaragua
3.7 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Afghanistan rank
68th
Nicaragua rank
69th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per over time

  • Afghanistan
  • Nicaragua
020406080197319982023

How they compare

Afghanistan currently reports 3.82 current US$ per square kilometre against 3.7 current US$ per square kilometre in Nicaragua, a difference of 0.12 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 38 shared years of data; in 1973 it was Nicaragua ahead.

Afghanistan ranks 68th and Nicaragua ranks 69th of 149 countries.

Nicaragua has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Afghanistan Nicaragua Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0337 current US$ per square kilometre 1.89 current US$ per square kilometre 1.86 current US$ per square kilometre Nicaragua
1980s 0.0358 current US$ per square kilometre 5.15 current US$ per square kilometre 5.12 current US$ per square kilometre Nicaragua
1990s 0.2913 current US$ per square kilometre 22.46 current US$ per square kilometre 22.17 current US$ per square kilometre Nicaragua
2000s 12.42 current US$ per square kilometre 33.3 current US$ per square kilometre 20.88 current US$ per square kilometre Nicaragua
2010s 9.95 current US$ per square kilometre 23.93 current US$ per square kilometre 13.99 current US$ per square kilometre Nicaragua
2020s 4.45 current US$ per square kilometre 8.42 current US$ per square kilometre 3.97 current US$ per square kilometre Nicaragua

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per, Afghanistan or Nicaragua?
Afghanistan, at 3.82 current US$ per square kilometre against 3.7 current US$ per square kilometre in Nicaragua as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per between Afghanistan and Nicaragua?
0.12 current US$ per square kilometre, with Afghanistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Nicaragua?
38 years are reported by both, from 1973 to 2023.
How do Afghanistan and Nicaragua rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per?
Afghanistan ranks 68th and Nicaragua ranks 69th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Afghanistan vs Nicaragua: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-belgium-current-us-per-square-kilometre/afghanistan/nicaragua/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-belgium-current-us-per-square-kilometre/afghanistan/nicaragua/">Afghanistan vs Nicaragua: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 7,969 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.