Barbados vs Hong Kong, China: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per

Barbados
46.51 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1997
Hong Kong, China
47.62 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1996
Barbados rank
19th
Hong Kong, China rank
18th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per over time

  • Barbados
  • Hong Kong, China
050100150200250196819821997

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 47.62 current US$ per square kilometre against 46.51 current US$ per square kilometre in Barbados, a difference of 1.11 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 1979 it was Barbados ahead.

Barbados ranks 19th and Hong Kong, China ranks 18th of 149 countries.

Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Hong Kong, China Difference Ahead
1970s 93.02 current US$ per square kilometre 20 current US$ per square kilometre 73.02 current US$ per square kilometre Barbados
1980s 220.93 current US$ per square kilometre 45.45 current US$ per square kilometre 175.48 current US$ per square kilometre Barbados
1990s 111.63 current US$ per square kilometre 71.23 current US$ per square kilometre 40.4 current US$ per square kilometre Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per, Barbados or Hong Kong, China?
Hong Kong, China, at 47.62 current US$ per square kilometre against 46.51 current US$ per square kilometre in Barbados as of 1996.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per between Barbados and Hong Kong, China?
1.11 current US$ per square kilometre, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Hong Kong, China?
8 years are reported by both, from 1979 to 1996.
How do Barbados and Hong Kong, China rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per?
Barbados ranks 19th and Hong Kong, China ranks 18th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Hong Kong, China: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-belgium-current-us-per-square-kilometre/barbados/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-belgium-current-us-per-square-kilometre/barbados/hong-kong-sar-china/">Barbados vs Hong Kong, China: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 7,969 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.