Central Europe and the Baltics vs Tanzania: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per

Central Europe and the Baltics
0.0091 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2010
Tanzania
10.88 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Central Europe and the Baltics rank
43rd
Tanzania rank
43rd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per over time

  • Central Europe and the Baltics
  • Tanzania
050100150200196719952023

How they compare

Tanzania currently reports 10.88 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.0091 current US$ per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics, a difference of 10.87 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Tanzania's figure about 1,200.8 times Central Europe and the Baltics's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 21 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Tanzania ahead.

Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 43rd and Tanzania ranks 43rd of 44 groups.

Across the 3 decades both report, Central Europe and the Baltics averaged higher in 1 and Tanzania in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central Europe and the Baltics Tanzania Difference Ahead
1990s 29.51 current US$ per square kilometre 20.65 current US$ per square kilometre 8.86 current US$ per square kilometre Central Europe and the Baltics
2000s 1.83 current US$ per square kilometre 22.02 current US$ per square kilometre 20.18 current US$ per square kilometre Tanzania
2010s 0.0091 current US$ per square kilometre 25.34 current US$ per square kilometre 25.34 current US$ per square kilometre Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per, Central Europe and the Baltics or Tanzania?
Tanzania, at 10.88 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.0091 current US$ per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per between Central Europe and the Baltics and Tanzania?
10.87 current US$ per square kilometre, with Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central Europe and the Baltics and Tanzania?
21 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2010.
How do Central Europe and the Baltics and Tanzania rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per?
Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 43rd and Tanzania ranks 43rd of 44 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central Europe and the Baltics vs Tanzania: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-belgium-current-us-per-square-kilometre/central-europe-and-the-baltics/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-belgium-current-us-per-square-kilometre/central-europe-and-the-baltics/tanzania/">Central Europe and the Baltics vs Tanzania: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 7,969 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.