Congo vs Nigeria: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per

Congo
2.61 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Nigeria
2.39 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
72nd
Nigeria rank
73rd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per over time

  • Congo
  • Nigeria
050100150200196619942023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 2.61 current US$ per square kilometre against 2.39 current US$ per square kilometre in Nigeria, a difference of 0.22 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Nigeria's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1967 it was Nigeria ahead.

Congo ranks 72nd and Nigeria ranks 73rd of 149 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 4 and Nigeria in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Nigeria Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0488 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0952 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0464 current US$ per square kilometre Nigeria
1970s 0.5564 current US$ per square kilometre 0.2503 current US$ per square kilometre 0.306 current US$ per square kilometre Congo
1980s 2.32 current US$ per square kilometre 0.347 current US$ per square kilometre 1.98 current US$ per square kilometre Congo
1990s 4.14 current US$ per square kilometre 0.594 current US$ per square kilometre 3.55 current US$ per square kilometre Congo
2000s 10 current US$ per square kilometre 38.12 current US$ per square kilometre 28.12 current US$ per square kilometre Nigeria
2010s 17.2 current US$ per square kilometre 2.89 current US$ per square kilometre 14.31 current US$ per square kilometre Congo
2020s 1.55 current US$ per square kilometre 6.2 current US$ per square kilometre 4.65 current US$ per square kilometre Nigeria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per, Congo or Nigeria?
Congo, at 2.61 current US$ per square kilometre against 2.39 current US$ per square kilometre in Nigeria as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per between Congo and Nigeria?
0.22 current US$ per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Nigeria?
57 years are reported by both, from 1967 to 2023.
How do Congo and Nigeria rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per?
Congo ranks 72nd and Nigeria ranks 73rd of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Nigeria: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-belgium-current-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/nigeria/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-belgium-current-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/nigeria/">Congo vs Nigeria: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 7,969 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.