Dominica vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per

Dominica
254.38 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2017
Sub-Saharan Africa
19.28 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Dominica rank
7th
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
6th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per over time

  • Dominica
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
0100200300400500196119922023

How they compare

Dominica currently reports 254.38 current US$ per square kilometre against 19.28 current US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 235.1 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Dominica's figure about 13.2 times Sub-Saharan Africa's.

Across all 21 years both countries report, Dominica has been ahead every year.

Dominica ranks 7th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 6th of 149 countries.

Dominica has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Dominica Sub-Saharan Africa Difference Ahead
1970s 133.33 current US$ per square kilometre 13.61 current US$ per square kilometre 119.72 current US$ per square kilometre Dominica
1980s 185.33 current US$ per square kilometre 11.3 current US$ per square kilometre 174.03 current US$ per square kilometre Dominica
1990s 58.33 current US$ per square kilometre 10.91 current US$ per square kilometre 47.42 current US$ per square kilometre Dominica
2000s 240 current US$ per square kilometre 27.09 current US$ per square kilometre 212.91 current US$ per square kilometre Dominica
2010s 254.38 current US$ per square kilometre 18.47 current US$ per square kilometre 235.91 current US$ per square kilometre Dominica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per, Dominica or Sub-Saharan Africa?
Dominica, at 254.38 current US$ per square kilometre against 19.28 current US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2017.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per between Dominica and Sub-Saharan Africa?
235.1 current US$ per square kilometre, with Dominica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Dominica and Sub-Saharan Africa?
21 years are reported by both, from 1979 to 2017.
How do Dominica and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per?
Dominica ranks 7th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 6th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Dominica vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-belgium-current-us-per-square-kilometre/dominica/sub-saharan-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-belgium-current-us-per-square-kilometre/dominica/sub-saharan-africa/">Dominica vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 7,969 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.