IBRD only vs Mozambique: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per

IBRD only
1.93 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Mozambique
22.38 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
IBRD only rank
29th
Mozambique rank
27th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per over time

  • IBRD only
  • Mozambique
010203040197019962023

How they compare

Mozambique currently reports 22.38 current US$ per square kilometre against 1.93 current US$ per square kilometre in IBRD only, a difference of 20.45 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Mozambique's figure about 11.6 times IBRD only's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 47 shared years of data; in 1976 it was IBRD only ahead.

IBRD only ranks 29th and Mozambique ranks 27th of 44 groups.

Across the 6 decades both report, IBRD only averaged higher in 2 and Mozambique in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade IBRD only Mozambique Difference Ahead
1970s 1.67 current US$ per square kilometre 0.2766 current US$ per square kilometre 1.39 current US$ per square kilometre IBRD only
1980s 1.46 current US$ per square kilometre 0.9258 current US$ per square kilometre 0.5296 current US$ per square kilometre IBRD only
1990s 2.39 current US$ per square kilometre 2.69 current US$ per square kilometre 0.3027 current US$ per square kilometre Mozambique
2000s 2.54 current US$ per square kilometre 16.72 current US$ per square kilometre 14.18 current US$ per square kilometre Mozambique
2010s 2.09 current US$ per square kilometre 26.52 current US$ per square kilometre 24.43 current US$ per square kilometre Mozambique
2020s 1.77 current US$ per square kilometre 20.75 current US$ per square kilometre 18.98 current US$ per square kilometre Mozambique

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per, IBRD only or Mozambique?
Mozambique, at 22.38 current US$ per square kilometre against 1.93 current US$ per square kilometre in IBRD only as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per between IBRD only and Mozambique?
20.45 current US$ per square kilometre, with Mozambique ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for IBRD only and Mozambique?
47 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2022.
How do IBRD only and Mozambique rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per?
IBRD only ranks 29th and Mozambique ranks 27th of 44 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

IBRD only vs Mozambique: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-belgium-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ibrd-only/mozambique/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-belgium-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ibrd-only/mozambique/">IBRD only vs Mozambique: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 7,969 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.