Latvia vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per

Latvia
0.9642 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2004
Zimbabwe
0.8558 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Latvia rank
88th
Zimbabwe rank
91st

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per over time

  • Latvia
  • Zimbabwe
051015198120022023

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 0.9642 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.8558 current US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.1084 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Latvia ahead.

Latvia ranks 88th and Zimbabwe ranks 91st of 149 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 4.87 current US$ per square kilometre 8.98 current US$ per square kilometre 4.1 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 0.5892 current US$ per square kilometre 8.42 current US$ per square kilometre 7.83 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per, Latvia or Zimbabwe?
Latvia, at 0.9642 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.8558 current US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2004.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per between Latvia and Zimbabwe?
0.1084 current US$ per square kilometre, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Zimbabwe?
6 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2004.
How do Latvia and Zimbabwe rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per?
Latvia ranks 88th and Zimbabwe ranks 91st of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-belgium-current-us-per-square-kilometre/latvia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-belgium-current-us-per-square-kilometre/latvia/zimbabwe/">Latvia vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 7,969 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.