Low income vs Rwanda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per

Low income
23.83 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
1,553 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Low income rank
1st
Rwanda rank
2nd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per over time

  • Low income
  • Rwanda
01.0k2.0k3.0k196119922023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 1,553 current US$ per square kilometre against 23.83 current US$ per square kilometre in Low income, a difference of 1,529 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 65.2 times Low income's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Rwanda has been ahead every year.

Low income ranks 1st and Rwanda ranks 2nd of 44 groups.

Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low income Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 6.39 current US$ per square kilometre 276.67 current US$ per square kilometre 270.28 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
1970s 12.75 current US$ per square kilometre 909.44 current US$ per square kilometre 896.69 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
1980s 16.18 current US$ per square kilometre 1,079 current US$ per square kilometre 1,063 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
1990s 10.74 current US$ per square kilometre 1,299 current US$ per square kilometre 1,288 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2000s 30.17 current US$ per square kilometre 1,385 current US$ per square kilometre 1,355 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2010s 32.43 current US$ per square kilometre 1,932 current US$ per square kilometre 1,900 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2020s 24.63 current US$ per square kilometre 1,946 current US$ per square kilometre 1,921 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per, Low income or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 1,553 current US$ per square kilometre against 23.83 current US$ per square kilometre in Low income as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per between Low income and Rwanda?
1,529 current US$ per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low income and Rwanda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Low income and Rwanda rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per?
Low income ranks 1st and Rwanda ranks 2nd of 44 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low income vs Rwanda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-belgium-current-us-per-square-kilometre/low-income/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-belgium-current-us-per-square-kilometre/low-income/rwanda/">Low income vs Rwanda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 7,969 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.