East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Tajikistan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
0 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Tajikistan
0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2009
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank
37th
Tajikistan rank
37th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per over time

  • East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
  • Tajikistan
0000196019912023

How they compare

Tajikistan currently reports 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), a difference of 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Tajikistan's figure about 105.6 times East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)'s.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Tajikistan ahead.

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 37th and Tajikistan ranks 37th of 44 groups.

Tajikistan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) Tajikistan Difference Ahead
1990s 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP Tajikistan
2000s 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP Tajikistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) or Tajikistan?
Tajikistan, at 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) as of 2009.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per between East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Tajikistan?
0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Tajikistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Tajikistan?
6 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2009.
How do East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Tajikistan rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per?
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 37th and Tajikistan ranks 37th of 44 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Tajikistan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-belgium-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/tajikistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-belgium-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/tajikistan/">East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Tajikistan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
193 places, 7,833 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.