Botswana vs Liberia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium

Botswana
-71,278 current US$
in 2016
Liberia
736 current US$
in 2022
Botswana rank
149th
Liberia rank
147th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium over time

  • Botswana
  • Liberia
010.0M20.0M30.0M40.0M50.0M197119962022

How they compare

Liberia currently reports 736 current US$ against -71,278 current US$ in Botswana, a difference of 72,014 current US$.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1977 it was Botswana ahead.

Botswana ranks 149th and Liberia ranks 147th of 151 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 2 and Liberia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Liberia Difference Ahead
1970s 30,000 current US$ 20,000 current US$ 10,000 current US$ Botswana
1980s 425,000 current US$ 427,500 current US$ 2,500 current US$ Liberia
1990s 396,000 current US$ 358,000 current US$ 38,000 current US$ Botswana
2000s 115,000 current US$ 440,000 current US$ 325,000 current US$ Liberia
2010s -24,682 current US$ 8.21 million current US$ 8.24 million current US$ Liberia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium, Botswana or Liberia?
Liberia, at 736 current US$ against -71,278 current US$ in Botswana as of 2022.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium between Botswana and Liberia?
72,014 current US$, with Liberia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Liberia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2016.
How do Botswana and Liberia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium?
Botswana ranks 149th and Liberia ranks 147th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Liberia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium. Statizoid, drawing on Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-belgium-current-us/botswana/liberia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-belgium-current-us/botswana/liberia/">Botswana vs Liberia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
197 places, 8,081 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors are the net disbursements of official development assistance (ODA) or official aid from the members of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC). Net disbursements are gross disbursements of grants and loans minus repayments of principal on earlier loans. ODA consists of loans made on concessional terms (with a grant element of at least 25 percent, calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent) and grants made to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. Official aid refers to aid flows from official donors to countries and territories in part II of the DAC list of recipients: more advanced countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the countries of the former Soviet Union, and certain advanced developing countries and territories. Official aid is provided under terms and conditions similar to those for ODA. Part II of the DAC List was abolished in 2005. The collection of data on official aid and other resource flows to Part II countries ended with 2004 data. DAC members are Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States, and European Union Institutions. Regional aggregates include data for economies not specified elsewhere. World and income group totals include aid not allocated by country or region. Data are in current U.S. dollars.