Cameroon vs Russia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), gaps over time
- Cameroon
- Russia
How they compare
Russia currently reports 13.20 million current US$ against 11.51 million current US$ in Cameroon, a difference of 1.69 million current US$.
That makes Russia's figure about 1.1 times Cameroon's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 14 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Cameroon ahead.
Cameroon ranks 47th and Russia ranks 44th of 167 countries.
Cameroon has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cameroon | Russia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 20.35 million current US$ | 13.95 million current US$ | 6.39 million current US$ | Cameroon |
| 2000s | 31.14 million current US$ | 15.54 million current US$ | 15.60 million current US$ | Cameroon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), gaps, Cameroon or Russia?
- Russia, at 13.20 million current US$ against 11.51 million current US$ in Cameroon as of 2004.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), gaps between Cameroon and Russia?
- 1.69 million current US$, with Russia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Russia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2004.
- How do Cameroon and Russia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), gaps?
- Cameroon ranks 47th and Russia ranks 44th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$) with 239 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.