Central African Republic vs Malawi: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), gaps

Central African Republic
8.31 million current US$
in 2023
Malawi
9.93 million current US$
in 2023
Central African Republic rank
55th
Malawi rank
52nd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), gaps over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Malawi
010.0M20.0M30.0M196319932023

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 9.93 million current US$ against 8.31 million current US$ in Central African Republic, a difference of 1.62 million current US$.

That makes Malawi's figure about 1.2 times Central African Republic's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 60 shared years of data; in 1964 it was Malawi ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 55th and Malawi ranks 52nd of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 1 and Malawi in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Malawi Difference Ahead
1960s 15,000 current US$ 240,000 current US$ 225,000 current US$ Malawi
1970s 102,000 current US$ 6.81 million current US$ 6.71 million current US$ Malawi
1980s 225,000 current US$ 6.60 million current US$ 6.37 million current US$ Malawi
1990s 311,000 current US$ 7.49 million current US$ 7.17 million current US$ Malawi
2000s 1.61 million current US$ 14.02 million current US$ 12.41 million current US$ Malawi
2010s 10.24 million current US$ 15.06 million current US$ 4.83 million current US$ Malawi
2020s 10.31 million current US$ 9.34 million current US$ 968,202 current US$ Central African Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), gaps, Central African Republic or Malawi?
Malawi, at 9.93 million current US$ against 8.31 million current US$ in Central African Republic as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), gaps between Central African Republic and Malawi?
1.62 million current US$, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Malawi?
60 years are reported by both, from 1964 to 2023.
How do Central African Republic and Malawi rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), gaps?
Central African Republic ranks 55th and Malawi ranks 52nd of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Malawi: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), gaps. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-canada-current-us-gaps-filled/central-african-republic/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-canada-current-us-gaps-filled/central-african-republic/malawi/">Central African Republic vs Malawi: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), gaps</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
214 places, 9,764 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$) with 239 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.