Croatia vs Tuvalu: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), gaps
Croatia
110,000 current US$
in 2009
Tuvalu
110,767 current US$
in 2023
Croatia rank
144th
Tuvalu rank
143rd
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), gaps over time
- Croatia
- Tuvalu
How they compare
Tuvalu currently reports 110,767 current US$ against 110,000 current US$ in Croatia, a difference of 767 current US$.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Croatia ahead.
Croatia ranks 144th and Tuvalu ranks 143rd of 167 countries.
Croatia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Tuvalu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 553,333 current US$ | 16,667 current US$ | 536,667 current US$ | Croatia |
| 2000s | 811,000 current US$ | 191,000 current US$ | 620,000 current US$ | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), gaps, Croatia or Tuvalu?
- Tuvalu, at 110,767 current US$ against 110,000 current US$ in Croatia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), gaps between Croatia and Tuvalu?
- 767 current US$, with Tuvalu ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Tuvalu?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2009.
- How do Croatia and Tuvalu rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), gaps?
- Croatia ranks 144th and Tuvalu ranks 143rd of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$) with 239 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.