Eritrea vs Latvia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), gaps
Eritrea
230,583 current US$
in 2023
Latvia
230,000 current US$
in 2004
Eritrea rank
118th
Latvia rank
119th
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), gaps over time
- Eritrea
- Latvia
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 230,583 current US$ against 230,000 current US$ in Latvia, a difference of 583 current US$.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 12 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Latvia ahead.
Eritrea ranks 118th and Latvia ranks 119th of 167 countries.
Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.88 million current US$ | 1.13 million current US$ | 752,857 current US$ | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 2.40 million current US$ | 678,000 current US$ | 1.72 million current US$ | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), gaps, Eritrea or Latvia?
- Eritrea, at 230,583 current US$ against 230,000 current US$ in Latvia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), gaps between Eritrea and Latvia?
- 583 current US$, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Latvia?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2004.
- How do Eritrea and Latvia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), gaps?
- Eritrea ranks 118th and Latvia ranks 119th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$) with 239 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.