Estonia vs Fiji: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), gaps
Estonia
400,000 current US$
in 2004
Fiji
492,000 current US$
in 2023
Estonia rank
111th
Fiji rank
109th
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), gaps over time
- Estonia
- Fiji
How they compare
Fiji currently reports 492,000 current US$ against 400,000 current US$ in Estonia, a difference of 92,000 current US$.
That makes Fiji's figure about 1.2 times Estonia's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Estonia has been ahead every year.
Estonia ranks 111th and Fiji ranks 109th of 167 countries.
Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Fiji | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.12 million current US$ | 25,000 current US$ | 1.09 million current US$ | Estonia |
| 2000s | 402,500 current US$ | 160,000 current US$ | 242,500 current US$ | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), gaps, Estonia or Fiji?
- Fiji, at 492,000 current US$ against 400,000 current US$ in Estonia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), gaps between Estonia and Fiji?
- 92,000 current US$, with Fiji ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Fiji?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2004.
- How do Estonia and Fiji rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), gaps?
- Estonia ranks 111th and Fiji ranks 109th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$) with 239 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.