Estonia vs Samoa: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), gaps
Estonia
400,000 current US$
in 2004
Samoa
299,670 current US$
in 2023
Estonia rank
111th
Samoa rank
114th
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), gaps over time
- Estonia
- Samoa
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 400,000 current US$ against 299,670 current US$ in Samoa, a difference of 100,330 current US$.
That makes Estonia's figure about 1.3 times Samoa's.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Estonia has been ahead every year.
Estonia ranks 111th and Samoa ranks 114th of 167 countries.
Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 575,000 current US$ | 15,000 current US$ | 560,000 current US$ | Estonia |
| 2000s | 464,000 current US$ | 60,000 current US$ | 404,000 current US$ | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), gaps, Estonia or Samoa?
- Estonia, at 400,000 current US$ against 299,670 current US$ in Samoa as of 2004.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), gaps between Estonia and Samoa?
- 100,330 current US$, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Samoa?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2004.
- How do Estonia and Samoa rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), gaps?
- Estonia ranks 111th and Samoa ranks 114th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$) with 239 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.