Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) vs South Sudan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), gaps

Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)
2.22 billion current US$
in 2022
South Sudan
79.69 million current US$
in 2023
Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) rank
7th
South Sudan rank
5th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), gaps over time

  • Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)
  • South Sudan
0500.0M1.0B1.5B2.0B197019962023

How they compare

Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) currently reports 2.22 billion current US$ against 79.69 million current US$ in South Sudan, a difference of 2.14 billion current US$.

That makes Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)'s figure about 27.9 times South Sudan's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2011 it was South Sudan ahead.

Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 7th and South Sudan ranks 5th of 45 groups.

Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) South Sudan Difference Ahead
2010s 70.44 million current US$ 70.02 million current US$ 426,322 current US$ Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)
2020s 720.63 million current US$ 89.82 million current US$ 630.82 million current US$ Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), gaps, Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) or South Sudan?
Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries), at 2.22 billion current US$ against 79.69 million current US$ in South Sudan as of 2022.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), gaps between Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) and South Sudan?
2.14 billion current US$, with Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) and South Sudan?
12 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2022.
How do Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) and South Sudan rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), gaps?
Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 7th and South Sudan ranks 5th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) vs South Sudan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), gaps. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-canada-current-us-gaps-filled/europe-and-central-asia-ida-and-ibrd-countries/south-sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-canada-current-us-gaps-filled/europe-and-central-asia-ida-and-ibrd-countries/south-sudan/">Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) vs South Sudan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), gaps</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
214 places, 9,764 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$) with 239 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.