Least developed countries vs Mozambique: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), gaps

Least developed countries
1.35 billion current US$
in 2022
Mozambique
55.62 million current US$
in 2023
Least developed countries rank
15th
Mozambique rank
17th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), gaps over time

  • Least developed countries
  • Mozambique
0500.0M1.0B1.5B197019962023

How they compare

Least developed countries currently reports 1.35 billion current US$ against 55.62 million current US$ in Mozambique, a difference of 1.29 billion current US$.

That makes Least developed countries's figure about 24.3 times Mozambique's.

Across all 47 years both countries report, Least developed countries has been ahead every year.

Least developed countries ranks 15th and Mozambique ranks 17th of 45 groups.

Least developed countries has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Least developed countries Mozambique Difference Ahead
1970s 173.38 million current US$ 1.73 million current US$ 171.65 million current US$ Least developed countries
1980s 303.21 million current US$ 11.50 million current US$ 291.71 million current US$ Least developed countries
1990s 292.61 million current US$ 19.20 million current US$ 273.40 million current US$ Least developed countries
2000s 664.27 million current US$ 40.02 million current US$ 624.25 million current US$ Least developed countries
2010s 1.14 billion current US$ 74.57 million current US$ 1.07 billion current US$ Least developed countries
2020s 1.17 billion current US$ 72.48 million current US$ 1.10 billion current US$ Least developed countries

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), gaps, Least developed countries or Mozambique?
Least developed countries, at 1.35 billion current US$ against 55.62 million current US$ in Mozambique as of 2022.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), gaps between Least developed countries and Mozambique?
1.29 billion current US$, with Least developed countries ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Least developed countries and Mozambique?
47 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2022.
How do Least developed countries and Mozambique rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), gaps?
Least developed countries ranks 15th and Mozambique ranks 17th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Least developed countries vs Mozambique: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), gaps. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-canada-current-us-gaps-filled/least-developed-countries-un-classification/mozambique/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-canada-current-us-gaps-filled/least-developed-countries-un-classification/mozambique/">Least developed countries vs Mozambique: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), gaps</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
214 places, 9,764 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$) with 239 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.