Malaysia vs Romania: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), gaps over time
- Malaysia
- Romania
How they compare
Romania currently reports 1.88 million current US$ against 1.53 million current US$ in Malaysia, a difference of 352,400 current US$.
That makes Romania's figure about 1.2 times Malaysia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 14 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Malaysia ahead.
Malaysia ranks 88th and Romania ranks 85th of 167 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Malaysia averaged higher in 1 and Romania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 5.09 million current US$ | 1.72 million current US$ | 3.37 million current US$ | Malaysia |
| 2000s | 842,000 current US$ | 2.30 million current US$ | 1.46 million current US$ | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), gaps, Malaysia or Romania?
- Romania, at 1.88 million current US$ against 1.53 million current US$ in Malaysia as of 2004.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), gaps between Malaysia and Romania?
- 352,400 current US$, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Romania?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2004.
- How do Malaysia and Romania rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), gaps?
- Malaysia ranks 88th and Romania ranks 85th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$) with 239 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.