Europe & Central Asia vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per

Europe & Central Asia
2.2 current US$ per person
in 2023
Turks and Caicos Islands
82.22 current US$ per person
in 2007
Europe & Central Asia rank
4th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
1st

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per over time

  • Europe & Central Asia
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
020406080196019912023

How they compare

Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 82.22 current US$ per person against 2.2 current US$ per person in Europe & Central Asia, a difference of 80.02 current US$ per person.

That makes Turks and Caicos Islands's figure about 37.5 times Europe & Central Asia's.

Across all 25 years both countries report, Turks and Caicos Islands has been ahead every year.

Europe & Central Asia ranks 4th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 1st of 45 groups.

Turks and Caicos Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Europe & Central Asia Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
1970s 0 current US$ per person 1.41 current US$ per person 1.41 current US$ per person Turks and Caicos Islands
1980s 0.0027 current US$ per person 10.54 current US$ per person 10.54 current US$ per person Turks and Caicos Islands
1990s 0.0107 current US$ per person 5.28 current US$ per person 5.27 current US$ per person Turks and Caicos Islands
2000s 0.0677 current US$ per person 19.9 current US$ per person 19.83 current US$ per person Turks and Caicos Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per, Europe & Central Asia or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Turks and Caicos Islands, at 82.22 current US$ per person against 2.2 current US$ per person in Europe & Central Asia as of 2007.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per between Europe & Central Asia and Turks and Caicos Islands?
80.02 current US$ per person, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Europe & Central Asia and Turks and Caicos Islands?
25 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2007.
How do Europe & Central Asia and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per?
Europe & Central Asia ranks 4th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 1st of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Europe & Central Asia vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-canada-current-us-per-capita/europe-and-central-asia/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-canada-current-us-per-capita/europe-and-central-asia/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Europe & Central Asia vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per capita
Unit
current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
214 places, 9,525 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.