Angola vs Papua New Guinea: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per

Angola
0.549 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Papua New Guinea
0.4438 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Angola rank
153rd
Papua New Guinea rank
155th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per over time

  • Angola
  • Papua New Guinea
02468197519992023

How they compare

Angola currently reports 0.549 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.4438 current US$ per square kilometre in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.1052 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Angola's figure about 1.2 times Papua New Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 37 shared years of data; in 1981 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.

Angola ranks 153rd and Papua New Guinea ranks 155th of 166 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 4 and Papua New Guinea in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1980s 1.48 current US$ per square kilometre 0.6649 current US$ per square kilometre 0.8181 current US$ per square kilometre Angola
1990s 3.77 current US$ per square kilometre 0.1684 current US$ per square kilometre 3.6 current US$ per square kilometre Angola
2000s 2.49 current US$ per square kilometre 0.9642 current US$ per square kilometre 1.52 current US$ per square kilometre Angola
2010s 0.3761 current US$ per square kilometre 0.8517 current US$ per square kilometre 0.4756 current US$ per square kilometre Papua New Guinea
2020s 0.7455 current US$ per square kilometre 0.2997 current US$ per square kilometre 0.4458 current US$ per square kilometre Angola

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per, Angola or Papua New Guinea?
Angola, at 0.549 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.4438 current US$ per square kilometre in Papua New Guinea as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per between Angola and Papua New Guinea?
0.1052 current US$ per square kilometre, with Angola ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Papua New Guinea?
37 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2023.
How do Angola and Papua New Guinea rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per?
Angola ranks 153rd and Papua New Guinea ranks 155th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Papua New Guinea: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-canada-current-us-per-square-kilometre/angola/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-canada-current-us-per-square-kilometre/angola/papua-new-guinea/">Angola vs Papua New Guinea: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
213 places, 9,394 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.