Belize vs OECD members: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per

Belize
156.15 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
OECD members
2.15 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Belize rank
39th
OECD members rank
42nd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per over time

  • Belize
  • OECD members
050100150200250196119922023

How they compare

Belize currently reports 156.15 current US$ per square kilometre against 2.15 current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members, a difference of 154 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Belize's figure about 72.6 times OECD members's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Belize ahead.

Belize ranks 39th and OECD members ranks 42nd of 166 countries.

Belize has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belize OECD members Difference Ahead
1970s 71.46 current US$ per square kilometre 0.212 current US$ per square kilometre 71.25 current US$ per square kilometre Belize
1980s 94.6 current US$ per square kilometre 0.5562 current US$ per square kilometre 94.04 current US$ per square kilometre Belize
1990s 20.91 current US$ per square kilometre 3.37 current US$ per square kilometre 17.54 current US$ per square kilometre Belize
2000s 39.85 current US$ per square kilometre 1.81 current US$ per square kilometre 38.04 current US$ per square kilometre Belize
2010s 12.66 current US$ per square kilometre 1.22 current US$ per square kilometre 11.44 current US$ per square kilometre Belize
2020s 48.27 current US$ per square kilometre 1.6 current US$ per square kilometre 46.67 current US$ per square kilometre Belize

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per, Belize or OECD members?
Belize, at 156.15 current US$ per square kilometre against 2.15 current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per between Belize and OECD members?
154 current US$ per square kilometre, with Belize ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and OECD members?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2022.
How do Belize and OECD members rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per?
Belize ranks 39th and OECD members ranks 42nd of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belize vs OECD members: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-canada-current-us-per-square-kilometre/belize/oecd-members/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-canada-current-us-per-square-kilometre/belize/oecd-members/">Belize vs OECD members: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
213 places, 9,394 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.