Botswana vs Brazil: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per

Botswana
0.2551 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Brazil
0.2732 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Botswana rank
158th
Brazil rank
157th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per over time

  • Botswana
  • Brazil
0102030196219922023

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 0.2732 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.2551 current US$ per square kilometre in Botswana, a difference of 0.0181 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Brazil's figure about 1.1 times Botswana's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 60 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Brazil ahead.

Botswana ranks 158th and Brazil ranks 157th of 166 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 6 and Brazil in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Brazil Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0735 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0961 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0226 current US$ per square kilometre Brazil
1970s 8.05 current US$ per square kilometre 0.2327 current US$ per square kilometre 7.82 current US$ per square kilometre Botswana
1980s 10.92 current US$ per square kilometre 0.4663 current US$ per square kilometre 10.45 current US$ per square kilometre Botswana
1990s 4.58 current US$ per square kilometre 0.4038 current US$ per square kilometre 4.17 current US$ per square kilometre Botswana
2000s 2 current US$ per square kilometre 0.9304 current US$ per square kilometre 1.07 current US$ per square kilometre Botswana
2010s 1.43 current US$ per square kilometre 0.2849 current US$ per square kilometre 1.14 current US$ per square kilometre Botswana
2020s 0.4514 current US$ per square kilometre 0.2118 current US$ per square kilometre 0.2397 current US$ per square kilometre Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per, Botswana or Brazil?
Brazil, at 0.2732 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.2551 current US$ per square kilometre in Botswana as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per between Botswana and Brazil?
0.0181 current US$ per square kilometre, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Brazil?
60 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Brazil rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per?
Botswana ranks 158th and Brazil ranks 157th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Brazil: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-canada-current-us-per-square-kilometre/botswana/brazil/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-canada-current-us-per-square-kilometre/botswana/brazil/">Botswana vs Brazil: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
213 places, 9,394 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.