Burundi vs OECD members: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per

Burundi
155.35 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
OECD members
2.15 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Burundi rank
40th
OECD members rank
42nd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per over time

  • Burundi
  • OECD members
0100200300196819952023

How they compare

Burundi currently reports 155.35 current US$ per square kilometre against 2.15 current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members, a difference of 153.2 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Burundi's figure about 72.2 times OECD members's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Burundi ahead.

Burundi ranks 40th and OECD members ranks 42nd of 166 countries.

Burundi has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burundi OECD members Difference Ahead
1970s 4.09 current US$ per square kilometre 0.212 current US$ per square kilometre 3.88 current US$ per square kilometre Burundi
1980s 32.2 current US$ per square kilometre 0.5542 current US$ per square kilometre 31.65 current US$ per square kilometre Burundi
1990s 84.46 current US$ per square kilometre 3.37 current US$ per square kilometre 81.09 current US$ per square kilometre Burundi
2000s 161.84 current US$ per square kilometre 1.81 current US$ per square kilometre 160.02 current US$ per square kilometre Burundi
2010s 163.79 current US$ per square kilometre 1.22 current US$ per square kilometre 162.57 current US$ per square kilometre Burundi
2020s 219.99 current US$ per square kilometre 1.6 current US$ per square kilometre 218.39 current US$ per square kilometre Burundi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per, Burundi or OECD members?
Burundi, at 155.35 current US$ per square kilometre against 2.15 current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per between Burundi and OECD members?
153.2 current US$ per square kilometre, with Burundi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and OECD members?
53 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2022.
How do Burundi and OECD members rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per?
Burundi ranks 40th and OECD members ranks 42nd of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burundi vs OECD members: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-canada-current-us-per-square-kilometre/burundi/oecd-members/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-canada-current-us-per-square-kilometre/burundi/oecd-members/">Burundi vs OECD members: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
213 places, 9,394 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.