Cape Verde vs Ecuador: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per

Cape Verde
37.44 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador
42.3 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Cape Verde rank
75th
Ecuador rank
72nd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per over time

  • Cape Verde
  • Ecuador
0100200300400500196819952023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 42.3 current US$ per square kilometre against 37.44 current US$ per square kilometre in Cape Verde, a difference of 4.86 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Cape Verde's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 46 shared years of data; in 1977 it was Cape Verde ahead.

Cape Verde ranks 75th and Ecuador ranks 72nd of 166 countries.

Cape Verde has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cape Verde Ecuador Difference Ahead
1970s 120.76 current US$ per square kilometre 1.44 current US$ per square kilometre 119.32 current US$ per square kilometre Cape Verde
1980s 63.28 current US$ per square kilometre 2.93 current US$ per square kilometre 60.35 current US$ per square kilometre Cape Verde
1990s 76.43 current US$ per square kilometre 17.18 current US$ per square kilometre 59.25 current US$ per square kilometre Cape Verde
2000s 111.17 current US$ per square kilometre 20.7 current US$ per square kilometre 90.46 current US$ per square kilometre Cape Verde
2010s 80.41 current US$ per square kilometre 5.04 current US$ per square kilometre 75.37 current US$ per square kilometre Cape Verde
2020s 58.83 current US$ per square kilometre 34.93 current US$ per square kilometre 23.89 current US$ per square kilometre Cape Verde

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per, Cape Verde or Ecuador?
Ecuador, at 42.3 current US$ per square kilometre against 37.44 current US$ per square kilometre in Cape Verde as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per between Cape Verde and Ecuador?
4.86 current US$ per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Ecuador?
46 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2023.
How do Cape Verde and Ecuador rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per?
Cape Verde ranks 75th and Ecuador ranks 72nd of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cape Verde vs Ecuador: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-canada-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cabo-verde/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-canada-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cabo-verde/ecuador/">Cape Verde vs Ecuador: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
213 places, 9,394 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.