Ecuador vs Tanzania: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per

Ecuador
42.3 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania
42.81 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
72nd
Tanzania rank
71st

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per over time

  • Ecuador
  • Tanzania
050100150200196119922023

How they compare

Tanzania currently reports 42.81 current US$ per square kilometre against 42.3 current US$ per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 0.51 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 56 shared years of data; in 1968 it was Tanzania ahead.

Ecuador ranks 72nd and Tanzania ranks 71st of 166 countries.

Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 1.81 current US$ per square kilometre 2.62 current US$ per square kilometre 0.8187 current US$ per square kilometre Tanzania
1970s 4.23 current US$ per square kilometre 19.9 current US$ per square kilometre 15.67 current US$ per square kilometre Tanzania
1980s 2.93 current US$ per square kilometre 34.02 current US$ per square kilometre 31.1 current US$ per square kilometre Tanzania
1990s 17.18 current US$ per square kilometre 21.34 current US$ per square kilometre 4.16 current US$ per square kilometre Tanzania
2000s 20.7 current US$ per square kilometre 41.25 current US$ per square kilometre 20.55 current US$ per square kilometre Tanzania
2010s 4.71 current US$ per square kilometre 105.6 current US$ per square kilometre 100.9 current US$ per square kilometre Tanzania
2020s 34.93 current US$ per square kilometre 72.3 current US$ per square kilometre 37.37 current US$ per square kilometre Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per, Ecuador or Tanzania?
Tanzania, at 42.81 current US$ per square kilometre against 42.3 current US$ per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per between Ecuador and Tanzania?
0.51 current US$ per square kilometre, with Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Tanzania?
56 years are reported by both, from 1968 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Tanzania rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per?
Ecuador ranks 72nd and Tanzania ranks 71st of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Tanzania: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-canada-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-canada-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/tanzania/">Ecuador vs Tanzania: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
213 places, 9,394 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.