Eswatini vs Tunisia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per

Eswatini
34.05 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tunisia
36.19 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini rank
80th
Tunisia rank
78th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per over time

  • Eswatini
  • Tunisia
0100200300196419932023

How they compare

Tunisia currently reports 36.19 current US$ per square kilometre against 34.05 current US$ per square kilometre in Eswatini, a difference of 2.14 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Tunisia's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 58 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Tunisia ahead.

Eswatini ranks 80th and Tunisia ranks 78th of 166 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 5 and Tunisia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Tunisia Difference Ahead
1960s 1.89 current US$ per square kilometre 18.39 current US$ per square kilometre 16.5 current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
1970s 42.5 current US$ per square kilometre 74.27 current US$ per square kilometre 31.77 current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
1980s 104.71 current US$ per square kilometre 46.46 current US$ per square kilometre 58.25 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1990s 65.81 current US$ per square kilometre 16.65 current US$ per square kilometre 49.17 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2000s 53.78 current US$ per square kilometre 6.75 current US$ per square kilometre 47.03 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2010s 48.3 current US$ per square kilometre -4.16 current US$ per square kilometre 52.46 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2020s 71.57 current US$ per square kilometre 32.07 current US$ per square kilometre 39.5 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per, Eswatini or Tunisia?
Tunisia, at 36.19 current US$ per square kilometre against 34.05 current US$ per square kilometre in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per between Eswatini and Tunisia?
2.14 current US$ per square kilometre, with Tunisia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Tunisia?
58 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Tunisia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per?
Eswatini ranks 80th and Tunisia ranks 78th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Tunisia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-canada-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-canada-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/tunisia/">Eswatini vs Tunisia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
213 places, 9,394 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.