Euro area vs Grenada: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per

Euro area
0.7688 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2004
Grenada
11,963 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Euro area rank
1st
Grenada rank
2nd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per over time

  • Euro area
  • Grenada
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k197019962023

How they compare

Grenada currently reports 11,963 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.7688 current US$ per square kilometre in Euro area, a difference of 11,962 current US$ per square kilometre.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Grenada has been ahead every year.

Euro area ranks 1st and Grenada ranks 2nd of 2 regions.

Grenada has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Euro area Grenada Difference Ahead
1970s 0.1221 current US$ per square kilometre 1,490 current US$ per square kilometre 1,490 current US$ per square kilometre Grenada
1980s 0.0144 current US$ per square kilometre 9,007 current US$ per square kilometre 9,007 current US$ per square kilometre Grenada
1990s 1.09 current US$ per square kilometre 1,174 current US$ per square kilometre 1,172 current US$ per square kilometre Grenada
2000s 1.02 current US$ per square kilometre 2,359 current US$ per square kilometre 2,358 current US$ per square kilometre Grenada

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per, Euro area or Grenada?
Grenada, at 11,963 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.7688 current US$ per square kilometre in Euro area as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per between Euro area and Grenada?
11,962 current US$ per square kilometre, with Grenada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Euro area and Grenada?
26 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2004.
How do Euro area and Grenada rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per?
Euro area ranks 1st and Grenada ranks 2nd of 2 regions.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Euro area vs Grenada: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-canada-current-us-per-square-kilometre/euro-area/grenada/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-canada-current-us-per-square-kilometre/euro-area/grenada/">Euro area vs Grenada: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
213 places, 9,394 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.