Gambia vs Rwanda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per

Gambia
281.45 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
267.78 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Gambia rank
28th
Rwanda rank
29th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per over time

  • Gambia
  • Rwanda
05001.0k1.5k2.0k2.5k196219922023

How they compare

Gambia currently reports 281.45 current US$ per square kilometre against 267.78 current US$ per square kilometre in Rwanda, a difference of 13.67 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Gambia's figure about 1.1 times Rwanda's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 54 shared years of data; in 1964 it was Rwanda ahead.

Gambia ranks 28th and Rwanda ranks 29th of 166 countries.

Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Gambia Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 3.29 current US$ per square kilometre 25.6 current US$ per square kilometre 22.31 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
1970s 76.58 current US$ per square kilometre 200.24 current US$ per square kilometre 123.66 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
1980s 59.88 current US$ per square kilometre 335.35 current US$ per square kilometre 275.47 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
1990s 30.53 current US$ per square kilometre 619.42 current US$ per square kilometre 588.88 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2000s 97.53 current US$ per square kilometre 363.52 current US$ per square kilometre 265.99 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2010s 57.32 current US$ per square kilometre 545.64 current US$ per square kilometre 488.31 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2020s 213.58 current US$ per square kilometre 446.87 current US$ per square kilometre 233.29 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per, Gambia or Rwanda?
Gambia, at 281.45 current US$ per square kilometre against 267.78 current US$ per square kilometre in Rwanda as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per between Gambia and Rwanda?
13.67 current US$ per square kilometre, with Gambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Rwanda?
54 years are reported by both, from 1964 to 2023.
How do Gambia and Rwanda rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per?
Gambia ranks 28th and Rwanda ranks 29th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Gambia vs Rwanda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-canada-current-us-per-square-kilometre/gambia-the/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-canada-current-us-per-square-kilometre/gambia-the/rwanda/">Gambia vs Rwanda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
213 places, 9,394 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.