Ghana vs Rwanda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per

Ghana
217.71 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
267.78 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Ghana rank
31st
Rwanda rank
29th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per over time

  • Ghana
  • Rwanda
05001.0k1.5k2.0k2.5k196119922023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 267.78 current US$ per square kilometre against 217.71 current US$ per square kilometre in Ghana, a difference of 50.07 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.2 times Ghana's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 60 shared years of data; in 1964 it was Ghana ahead.

Ghana ranks 31st and Rwanda ranks 29th of 166 countries.

Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ghana Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 13.78 current US$ per square kilometre 25.6 current US$ per square kilometre 11.83 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
1970s 52.3 current US$ per square kilometre 154.24 current US$ per square kilometre 101.94 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
1980s 81.61 current US$ per square kilometre 335.35 current US$ per square kilometre 253.74 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
1990s 105.68 current US$ per square kilometre 619.42 current US$ per square kilometre 513.74 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2000s 205.23 current US$ per square kilometre 363.52 current US$ per square kilometre 158.29 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2010s 325.84 current US$ per square kilometre 545.64 current US$ per square kilometre 219.79 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2020s 242.09 current US$ per square kilometre 446.87 current US$ per square kilometre 204.78 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per, Ghana or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 267.78 current US$ per square kilometre against 217.71 current US$ per square kilometre in Ghana as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per between Ghana and Rwanda?
50.07 current US$ per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Rwanda?
60 years are reported by both, from 1964 to 2023.
How do Ghana and Rwanda rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per?
Ghana ranks 31st and Rwanda ranks 29th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ghana vs Rwanda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-canada-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ghana/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-canada-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ghana/rwanda/">Ghana vs Rwanda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
213 places, 9,394 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.