Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Singapore: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
62.02 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Singapore
880.6 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1995
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank
13th
Singapore rank
15th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per over time

  • Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
  • Singapore
05001.0k1.5k196119912022

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 880.6 current US$ per square kilometre against 62.02 current US$ per square kilometre in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), a difference of 818.58 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Singapore's figure about 14.2 times Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)'s.

Across all 22 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 13th and Singapore ranks 15th of 45 groups.

Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) Singapore Difference Ahead
1970s 5.36 current US$ per square kilometre 535.18 current US$ per square kilometre 529.82 current US$ per square kilometre Singapore
1980s 17.19 current US$ per square kilometre 943.62 current US$ per square kilometre 926.43 current US$ per square kilometre Singapore
1990s 20.1 current US$ per square kilometre 945.27 current US$ per square kilometre 925.17 current US$ per square kilometre Singapore

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per, Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) or Singapore?
Singapore, at 880.6 current US$ per square kilometre against 62.02 current US$ per square kilometre in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) as of 1995.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per between Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Singapore?
818.58 current US$ per square kilometre, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Singapore?
22 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 1995.
How do Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Singapore rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per?
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 13th and Singapore ranks 15th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Singapore: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-canada-current-us-per-square-kilometre/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-canada-current-us-per-square-kilometre/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/singapore/">Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Singapore: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
213 places, 9,394 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.