Malawi vs Sao Tome and Principe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per

Malawi
105.35 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
107.83 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Malawi rank
51st
Sao Tome and Principe rank
49th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per over time

  • Malawi
  • Sao Tome and Principe
05001.0k1.5k196419932023

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 107.83 current US$ per square kilometre against 105.35 current US$ per square kilometre in Malawi, a difference of 2.48 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 37 shared years of data; in 1982 it was Malawi ahead.

Malawi ranks 51st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 49th of 166 countries.

Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1980s 73.7 current US$ per square kilometre 79.17 current US$ per square kilometre 5.47 current US$ per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
1990s 79.4 current US$ per square kilometre 123.96 current US$ per square kilometre 44.56 current US$ per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2000s 157.36 current US$ per square kilometre 464.12 current US$ per square kilometre 306.76 current US$ per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 158 current US$ per square kilometre 158.94 current US$ per square kilometre 0.9385 current US$ per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 99.05 current US$ per square kilometre 212.51 current US$ per square kilometre 113.47 current US$ per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per, Malawi or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 107.83 current US$ per square kilometre against 105.35 current US$ per square kilometre in Malawi as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per between Malawi and Sao Tome and Principe?
2.48 current US$ per square kilometre, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Sao Tome and Principe?
37 years are reported by both, from 1982 to 2023.
How do Malawi and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per?
Malawi ranks 51st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 49th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malawi vs Sao Tome and Principe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-canada-current-us-per-square-kilometre/malawi/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-canada-current-us-per-square-kilometre/malawi/sao-tome-and-principe/">Malawi vs Sao Tome and Principe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
213 places, 9,394 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.