Central African Republic vs Palestine: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada … Canada unit

Central African Republic
0.0033 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Palestine
0.0039 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Central African Republic rank
7th
Palestine rank
5th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada … Canada unit over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Palestine
00.0030.0050.0070.01196319932023

How they compare

Palestine currently reports 0.0039 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0033 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Central African Republic, a difference of 0.0006 current US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Palestine's figure about 1.2 times Central African Republic's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Central African Republic ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 7th and Palestine ranks 5th of 164 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 2 and Palestine in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Palestine Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0003 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0005 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP Palestine
2000s 0.001 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0038 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0028 current US$ per US$ of GDP Palestine
2010s 0.0052 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0036 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0016 current US$ per US$ of GDP Central African Republic
2020s 0.0042 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0026 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0016 current US$ per US$ of GDP Central African Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per, Central African Republic or Palestine?
Palestine, at 0.0039 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0033 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Central African Republic as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per between Central African Republic and Palestine?
0.0006 current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Palestine ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Palestine?
30 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2023.
How do Central African Republic and Palestine rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per?
Central African Republic ranks 7th and Palestine ranks 5th of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Palestine: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 November 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-canada-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/central-african-republic/west-bank-and-gaza/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-canada-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/central-african-republic/west-bank-and-gaza/">Central African Republic vs Palestine: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
211 places, 9,168 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.