Late-demographic dividend vs Uganda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per

Late-demographic dividend
0 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Uganda
0.0005 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Late-demographic dividend rank
40th
Uganda rank
38th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per over time

  • Late-demographic dividend
  • Uganda
00.0010.0020.003196019912023

How they compare

Uganda currently reports 0.0005 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Late-demographic dividend, a difference of 0.0005 current US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Uganda's figure about 94.7 times Late-demographic dividend's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Uganda ahead.

Late-demographic dividend ranks 40th and Uganda ranks 38th of 45 groups.

Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Late-demographic dividend Uganda Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0006 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0005 current US$ per US$ of GDP Uganda
1980s 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0013 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0012 current US$ per US$ of GDP Uganda
1990s 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0011 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.001 current US$ per US$ of GDP Uganda
2000s 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0011 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.001 current US$ per US$ of GDP Uganda
2010s 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0004 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0003 current US$ per US$ of GDP Uganda
2020s 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0005 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0005 current US$ per US$ of GDP Uganda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per, Late-demographic dividend or Uganda?
Uganda, at 0.0005 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Late-demographic dividend as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per between Late-demographic dividend and Uganda?
0.0005 current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Uganda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Late-demographic dividend and Uganda?
53 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2022.
How do Late-demographic dividend and Uganda rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per?
Late-demographic dividend ranks 40th and Uganda ranks 38th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Late-demographic dividend vs Uganda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-canada-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/late-demographic-dividend/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-canada-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/late-demographic-dividend/uganda/">Late-demographic dividend vs Uganda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
211 places, 9,168 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.