Low income vs South Sudan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per
Low income
0.0012 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2023
South Sudan
0.0073 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2015
Low income rank
1st
South Sudan rank
2nd
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per over time
- Low income
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 0.0073 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0012 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Low income, a difference of 0.0061 current US$ per US$ of GDP.
That makes South Sudan's figure about 6.0 times Low income's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.
Low income ranks 1st and South Sudan ranks 2nd of 45 groups.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per, Low income or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 0.0073 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0012 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Low income as of 2015.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per between Low income and South Sudan?
- 0.0061 current US$ per US$ of GDP, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Low income and South Sudan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2015.
- How do Low income and South Sudan rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per?
- Low income ranks 1st and South Sudan ranks 2nd of 45 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.