South Sudan vs Palestine: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada … Canada unit
South Sudan
0.0073 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2015
Palestine
0.0039 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2023
South Sudan rank
2nd
Palestine rank
5th
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada … Canada unit over time
- South Sudan
- Palestine
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 0.0073 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0039 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Palestine, a difference of 0.0034 current US$ per US$ of GDP.
That makes South Sudan's figure about 1.9 times Palestine's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Palestine ahead.
South Sudan ranks 2nd and Palestine ranks 5th of 164 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per, South Sudan or Palestine?
- South Sudan, at 0.0073 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0039 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Palestine as of 2015.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per between South Sudan and Palestine?
- 0.0034 current US$ per US$ of GDP, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Sudan and Palestine?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2015.
- How do South Sudan and Palestine rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per?
- South Sudan ranks 2nd and Palestine ranks 5th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.