Guinea-Bissau vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada

Guinea-Bissau
1.77 million current US$
in 2023
Turks and Caicos Islands
2.16 million current US$
in 2007
Guinea-Bissau rank
86th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
84th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
0500.0k1.0M1.5M2.0M197720002023

How they compare

Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 2.16 million current US$ against 1.77 million current US$ in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 394,360 current US$.

That makes Turks and Caicos Islands's figure about 1.2 times Guinea-Bissau's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 24 shared years of data; in 1979 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 86th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 84th of 167 countries.

Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
1970s 40,000 current US$ 10,000 current US$ 30,000 current US$ Guinea-Bissau
1980s 282,222 current US$ 103,333 current US$ 178,889 current US$ Guinea-Bissau
1990s 393,333 current US$ 68,333 current US$ 325,000 current US$ Guinea-Bissau
2000s 652,500 current US$ 490,000 current US$ 162,500 current US$ Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada, Guinea-Bissau or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Turks and Caicos Islands, at 2.16 million current US$ against 1.77 million current US$ in Guinea-Bissau as of 2007.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada between Guinea-Bissau and Turks and Caicos Islands?
394,360 current US$, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Turks and Caicos Islands?
24 years are reported by both, from 1979 to 2007.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 86th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 84th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea-Bissau vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada. Statizoid, drawing on Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-canada-current-us/guinea-bissau/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-canada-current-us/guinea-bissau/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Guinea-Bissau vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
214 places, 9,525 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors are the net disbursements of official development assistance (ODA) or official aid from the members of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC). Net disbursements are gross disbursements of grants and loans minus repayments of principal on earlier loans. ODA consists of loans made on concessional terms (with a grant element of at least 25 percent, calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent) and grants made to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. Official aid refers to aid flows from official donors to countries and territories in part II of the DAC list of recipients: more advanced countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the countries of the former Soviet Union, and certain advanced developing countries and territories. Official aid is provided under terms and conditions similar to those for ODA. Part II of the DAC List was abolished in 2005. The collection of data on official aid and other resource flows to Part II countries ended with 2004 data. DAC members are Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States, and European Union Institutions. Regional aggregates include data for economies not specified elsewhere. World and income group totals include aid not allocated by country or region. Data are in current U.S. dollars.