Africa Eastern and Southern vs Eswatini: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$)

Africa Eastern and Southern
31.1 % change on previous year
in 2019
Eswatini
176.12 % change on previous year
in 2011
Africa Eastern and Southern rank
6th
Eswatini rank
6th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) over time

  • Africa Eastern and Southern
  • Eswatini
-750-500-2500250197119952019

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 176.12 % change on previous year against 31.1 % change on previous year in Africa Eastern and Southern, a difference of 145.02 % change on previous year.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 5.7 times Africa Eastern and Southern's.

The two have swapped places 23 times across 37 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Africa Eastern and Southern ahead.

Africa Eastern and Southern ranks 6th and Eswatini ranks 6th of 46 groups.

Across the 5 decades both report, Africa Eastern and Southern averaged higher in 4 and Eswatini in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Africa Eastern and Southern Eswatini Difference Ahead
1970s 23.03 % change on previous year 6.7 % change on previous year 16.33 % change on previous year Africa Eastern and Southern
1980s 10.01 % change on previous year -6.77 % change on previous year 16.78 % change on previous year Africa Eastern and Southern
1990s 4.41 % change on previous year -68.41 % change on previous year 72.82 % change on previous year Africa Eastern and Southern
2000s 5.86 % change on previous year -58.26 % change on previous year 64.12 % change on previous year Africa Eastern and Southern
2010s 2.44 % change on previous year 113.24 % change on previous year 110.81 % change on previous year Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), Africa Eastern and Southern or Eswatini?
Eswatini, at 176.12 % change on previous year against 31.1 % change on previous year in Africa Eastern and Southern as of 2011.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$) between Africa Eastern and Southern and Eswatini?
145.02 % change on previous year, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Africa Eastern and Southern and Eswatini?
37 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2011.
How do Africa Eastern and Southern and Eswatini rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$)?
Africa Eastern and Southern ranks 6th and Eswatini ranks 6th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Africa Eastern and Southern vs Eswatini: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-denmark-current-us-annual-growth-rate/africa-eastern-and-southern/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-denmark-current-us-annual-growth-rate/africa-eastern-and-southern/eswatini/">Africa Eastern and Southern vs Eswatini: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 5,991 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.