Belarus vs Bhutan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps
Belarus
-2,374 current US$
in 2023
Bhutan
-11,335 current US$
in 2019
Belarus rank
127th
Bhutan rank
130th
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps over time
- Belarus
- Bhutan
How they compare
Belarus currently reports -2,374 current US$ against -11,335 current US$ in Bhutan, a difference of 8,961 current US$.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Bhutan ahead.
Belarus ranks 127th and Bhutan ranks 130th of 135 countries.
Bhutan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Bhutan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.01 million current US$ | 14.05 million current US$ | 13.04 million current US$ | Bhutan |
| 2010s | 947,662 current US$ | 5.18 million current US$ | 4.23 million current US$ | Bhutan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps, Belarus or Bhutan?
- Belarus, at -2,374 current US$ against -11,335 current US$ in Bhutan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps between Belarus and Bhutan?
- 8,961 current US$, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Bhutan?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and Bhutan rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps?
- Belarus ranks 127th and Bhutan ranks 130th of 135 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) with 378 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.