Belize vs Bhutan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps
Belize
-10,000 current US$
in 2003
Bhutan
-11,335 current US$
in 2019
Belize rank
128th
Bhutan rank
130th
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps over time
- Belize
- Bhutan
How they compare
Belize currently reports -10,000 current US$ against -11,335 current US$ in Bhutan, a difference of 1,335 current US$.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Bhutan has been ahead every year.
Belize ranks 128th and Bhutan ranks 130th of 135 countries.
Bhutan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belize | Bhutan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 136,000 current US$ | 9.37 million current US$ | 9.23 million current US$ | Bhutan |
| 2000s | -10,000 current US$ | 14.92 million current US$ | 14.93 million current US$ | Bhutan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps, Belize or Bhutan?
- Belize, at -10,000 current US$ against -11,335 current US$ in Bhutan as of 2003.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps between Belize and Bhutan?
- 1,335 current US$, with Belize ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Bhutan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2003.
- How do Belize and Bhutan rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps?
- Belize ranks 128th and Bhutan ranks 130th of 135 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) with 378 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.