Burundi vs Russia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark … Denmark gaps
Burundi
626,569 current US$
in 2023
Russia
690,000 current US$
in 2004
Burundi rank
66th
Russia rank
65th
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark … Denmark gaps over time
- Burundi
- Russia
How they compare
Russia currently reports 690,000 current US$ against 626,569 current US$ in Burundi, a difference of 63,431 current US$.
That makes Russia's figure about 1.1 times Burundi's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Russia has been ahead every year.
Burundi ranks 66th and Russia ranks 65th of 135 countries.
Russia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burundi | Russia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 410,000 current US$ | 9.09 million current US$ | 8.68 million current US$ | Russia |
| 2000s | 90,000 current US$ | 690,000 current US$ | 600,000 current US$ | Russia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps, Burundi or Russia?
- Russia, at 690,000 current US$ against 626,569 current US$ in Burundi as of 2004.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps between Burundi and Russia?
- 63,431 current US$, with Russia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Russia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2004.
- How do Burundi and Russia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps?
- Burundi ranks 66th and Russia ranks 65th of 135 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) with 378 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.