Chile vs Estonia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps over time
- Chile
- Estonia
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 7.10 million current US$ against 4.58 million current US$ in Chile, a difference of 2.52 million current US$.
That makes Estonia's figure about 1.6 times Chile's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 14 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 28th and Estonia ranks 25th of 135 countries.
Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Estonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.31 million current US$ | 5.00 million current US$ | 3.69 million current US$ | Estonia |
| 2000s | 169,000 current US$ | 8.45 million current US$ | 8.28 million current US$ | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps, Chile or Estonia?
- Estonia, at 7.10 million current US$ against 4.58 million current US$ in Chile as of 2004.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps between Chile and Estonia?
- 2.52 million current US$, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Estonia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2004.
- How do Chile and Estonia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps?
- Chile ranks 28th and Estonia ranks 25th of 135 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) with 378 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.