China vs Eswatini: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps

China
425,495 current US$
in 2023
Eswatini
510,000 current US$
in 2011
China rank
76th
Eswatini rank
73rd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps over time

  • China
  • Eswatini
-20.0M-10.0M010.0M20.0M196819952023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 510,000 current US$ against 425,495 current US$ in China, a difference of 84,505 current US$.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.2 times China's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Eswatini ahead.

China ranks 76th and Eswatini ranks 73rd of 135 countries.

China has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Eswatini Difference Ahead
1980s 9.71 million current US$ 1.70 million current US$ 8.01 million current US$ China
1990s 7.69 million current US$ 516,000 current US$ 7.17 million current US$ China
2000s 3.52 million current US$ -796,000 current US$ 4.32 million current US$ China
2010s 6.42 million current US$ -80,000 current US$ 6.50 million current US$ China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps, China or Eswatini?
Eswatini, at 510,000 current US$ against 425,495 current US$ in China as of 2011.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps between China and Eswatini?
84,505 current US$, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Eswatini?
32 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2011.
How do China and Eswatini rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps?
China ranks 76th and Eswatini ranks 73rd of 135 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Eswatini: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-denmark-current-us-gaps-filled/china/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-denmark-current-us-gaps-filled/china/eswatini/">China vs Eswatini: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 7,224 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) with 378 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.