Congo vs Montenegro: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps over time
- Congo
- Montenegro
How they compare
Congo currently reports 7,137 current US$ against 558 current US$ in Montenegro, a difference of 6,579 current US$.
That makes Congo's figure about 12.8 times Montenegro's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Montenegro ahead.
Congo ranks 117th and Montenegro ranks 119th of 135 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Montenegro in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 80,000 current US$ | 290,000 current US$ | 210,000 current US$ | Montenegro |
| 2010s | 941,371 current US$ | 579,819 current US$ | 361,552 current US$ | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps, Congo or Montenegro?
- Congo, at 7,137 current US$ against 558 current US$ in Montenegro as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps between Congo and Montenegro?
- 6,579 current US$, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Montenegro?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2013.
- How do Congo and Montenegro rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps?
- Congo ranks 117th and Montenegro ranks 119th of 135 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) with 378 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.