Costa Rica vs Samoa: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps over time
- Costa Rica
- Samoa
How they compare
Samoa currently reports 50,000 current US$ against 30,000 current US$ in Costa Rica, a difference of 20,000 current US$.
That makes Samoa's figure about 1.7 times Costa Rica's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 1976 it was Samoa ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 101st and Samoa ranks 98th of 135 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 1 and Samoa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 10,000 current US$ | 151,250 current US$ | 141,250 current US$ | Samoa |
| 1980s | 76,250 current US$ | 55,000 current US$ | 21,250 current US$ | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps, Costa Rica or Samoa?
- Samoa, at 50,000 current US$ against 30,000 current US$ in Costa Rica as of 1984.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps between Costa Rica and Samoa?
- 20,000 current US$, with Samoa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Samoa?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 1983.
- How do Costa Rica and Samoa rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps?
- Costa Rica ranks 101st and Samoa ranks 98th of 135 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) with 378 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.