Croatia vs Eswatini: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps
Croatia
510,000 current US$
in 2010
Eswatini
510,000 current US$
in 2011
Croatia rank
73rd
Eswatini rank
73rd
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps over time
- Croatia
- Eswatini
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 510,000 current US$ against 510,000 current US$ in Eswatini, a difference of 0 current US$.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 14 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Croatia ahead.
Croatia ranks 73rd and Eswatini ranks 73rd of 135 countries.
Croatia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 715,000 current US$ | 360,000 current US$ | 355,000 current US$ | Croatia |
| 2000s | 539,500 current US$ | -796,000 current US$ | 1.34 million current US$ | Croatia |
| 2010s | 510,000 current US$ | -670,000 current US$ | 1.18 million current US$ | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps, Croatia or Eswatini?
- Croatia, at 510,000 current US$ against 510,000 current US$ in Eswatini as of 2010.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps between Croatia and Eswatini?
- 0 current US$, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Eswatini?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2010.
- How do Croatia and Eswatini rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps?
- Croatia ranks 73rd and Eswatini ranks 73rd of 135 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) with 378 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.