Croatia vs Togo: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps
Croatia
510,000 current US$
in 2010
Togo
580,345 current US$
in 2023
Croatia rank
73rd
Togo rank
70th
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps over time
- Croatia
- Togo
How they compare
Togo currently reports 580,345 current US$ against 510,000 current US$ in Croatia, a difference of 70,345 current US$.
That makes Togo's figure about 1.1 times Croatia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Togo ahead.
Croatia ranks 73rd and Togo ranks 70th of 135 countries.
Togo has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Togo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 552,500 current US$ | 603,750 current US$ | 51,250 current US$ | Togo |
| 2010s | 510,000 current US$ | 1.27 million current US$ | 760,000 current US$ | Togo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps, Croatia or Togo?
- Togo, at 580,345 current US$ against 510,000 current US$ in Croatia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps between Croatia and Togo?
- 70,345 current US$, with Togo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Togo?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2010.
- How do Croatia and Togo rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps?
- Croatia ranks 73rd and Togo ranks 70th of 135 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) with 378 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.