Cuba vs East Asia & Pacific: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps

Cuba
3.43 million current US$
in 2019
East Asia & Pacific
20.70 million current US$
in 2023
Cuba rank
34th
East Asia & Pacific rank
33rd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps over time

  • Cuba
  • East Asia & Pacific
050.0M100.0M150.0M196019912023

How they compare

East Asia & Pacific currently reports 20.70 million current US$ against 3.43 million current US$ in Cuba, a difference of 17.27 million current US$.

That makes East Asia & Pacific's figure about 6.0 times Cuba's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, East Asia & Pacific has been ahead every year.

Cuba ranks 34th and East Asia & Pacific ranks 33rd of 135 countries.

East Asia & Pacific has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba East Asia & Pacific Difference Ahead
1970s 268,333 current US$ 18.51 million current US$ 18.24 million current US$ East Asia & Pacific
1980s 120,000 current US$ 26.62 million current US$ 26.50 million current US$ East Asia & Pacific
1990s 100,000 current US$ 77.70 million current US$ 77.61 million current US$ East Asia & Pacific
2000s 45,833 current US$ 113.09 million current US$ 113.05 million current US$ East Asia & Pacific
2010s 2.22 million current US$ 52.56 million current US$ 50.34 million current US$ East Asia & Pacific

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps, Cuba or East Asia & Pacific?
East Asia & Pacific, at 20.70 million current US$ against 3.43 million current US$ in Cuba as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps between Cuba and East Asia & Pacific?
17.27 million current US$, with East Asia & Pacific ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and East Asia & Pacific?
24 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2019.
How do Cuba and East Asia & Pacific rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps?
Cuba ranks 34th and East Asia & Pacific ranks 33rd of 135 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs East Asia & Pacific: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-denmark-current-us-gaps-filled/cuba/east-asia-and-pacific/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-denmark-current-us-gaps-filled/cuba/east-asia-and-pacific/">Cuba vs East Asia & Pacific: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 7,224 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) with 378 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.