Cuba vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps

Cuba
3.43 million current US$
in 2019
Zimbabwe
3.66 million current US$
in 2023
Cuba rank
34th
Zimbabwe rank
32nd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps over time

  • Cuba
  • Zimbabwe
010.0M20.0M30.0M197119972023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 3.66 million current US$ against 3.43 million current US$ in Cuba, a difference of 227,080 current US$.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Cuba's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 18 shared years of data; in 1977 it was Cuba ahead.

Cuba ranks 34th and Zimbabwe ranks 32nd of 135 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1970s 233,333 current US$ 350,000 current US$ 116,667 current US$ Zimbabwe
1980s 120,000 current US$ 3.13 million current US$ 3.02 million current US$ Zimbabwe
1990s 100,000 current US$ 25.93 million current US$ 25.84 million current US$ Zimbabwe
2000s 45,833 current US$ 17.14 million current US$ 17.10 million current US$ Zimbabwe
2010s 2.22 million current US$ 8.13 million current US$ 5.91 million current US$ Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps, Cuba or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 3.66 million current US$ against 3.43 million current US$ in Cuba as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps between Cuba and Zimbabwe?
227,080 current US$, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Zimbabwe?
18 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2019.
How do Cuba and Zimbabwe rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps?
Cuba ranks 34th and Zimbabwe ranks 32nd of 135 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-denmark-current-us-gaps-filled/cuba/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-denmark-current-us-gaps-filled/cuba/zimbabwe/">Cuba vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 7,224 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) with 378 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.