Czechia vs Mexico: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps
Czechia
570,000 current US$
in 2004
Mexico
576,859 current US$
in 2023
Czechia rank
72nd
Mexico rank
71st
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps over time
- Czechia
- Mexico
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 576,859 current US$ against 570,000 current US$ in Czechia, a difference of 6,859 current US$.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Czechia has been ahead every year.
Czechia ranks 72nd and Mexico ranks 71st of 135 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.75 million current US$ | -640,000 current US$ | 3.39 million current US$ | Czechia |
| 2000s | 1.53 million current US$ | -442,000 current US$ | 1.97 million current US$ | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps, Czechia or Mexico?
- Mexico, at 576,859 current US$ against 570,000 current US$ in Czechia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps between Czechia and Mexico?
- 6,859 current US$, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Mexico?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2004.
- How do Czechia and Mexico rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps?
- Czechia ranks 72nd and Mexico ranks 71st of 135 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) with 378 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.